On 2015-05-06 21:08, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
On #15635 <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15635>, we are trying to
decide whether we want non-associative algebras to be included in the
catalog of algebras.
The argument against including them is "most" people think of algebras
as being associative (and maybe even unital), and as such, might
surprise people when they come across the non-associativity in their
computations.
Even if people think that algebras are associative, they will be aware
that "non-associative algebras" exist and they shouldn't be surprised to
see them in the algebras catalog.
So +1 to putting them in the catalog.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
