Hi! On 2015-05-05, David Roe <roed.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Parent should represent an object in a category that has a forgetful > functor to sets; CategoryObject an object in an arbitrary category. I have > no objection to moving the generator and name code to Parent.
Perhaps not the name code (if you are talking about the string representation of the object itself), but I think the generator stuff could indeed be moved. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
