Salut Vincent!
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:39:27AM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> On 20/04/15 04:54, David Roe wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I agree, coercion G -> M is probably the right thing to do here.
> >>
> >+1
>
> Thanks for your support! I opened #18258.
Though note that doing equality up to coercion has drawbacks; in
particular since it can easily break Python's specification that two
equal objects shall have the same hash.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/EqualityCoercion
In the case at hand, it might be possible to guarantee that the hash
is preserved upon coercion, so that could be ok.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
