On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems to me that binary distributions are not guaranteed to be able to > build some optional packages.
Side question -- Is anything guaranteed to build all optional packages? What's the current status of testing them? I keep raising this issue... > There were numerous reports on sage-support, and here is another example: > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18198 > > However, reading http://sagemath.org/doc/installation/quick-guide.html > gives you a false impression to this effect. > > Should the text in this link be adjusted to tell people to use source > distros? > > Dima > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
