On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:24:42AM -0700, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> I think it would already be better if there wasn't this bug
> preventing authors from linking between document trees.That's
> presumably why the three random tutorials I picked (calculus,
> p-adics, combinatorics) had not a single link to the reference
> manual.
Actually you can ref from the thematic tutorial back to the reference
manual, and there already are many (not enough!!!) such links:
/opt/sage/src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials>grep :meth: **/*.rst
coercion_and_categories.rst::meth:`~sage.categories.commutative_additive_monoids.CommutativeAdditiveMonoids.ParentMethods.sum`::
coercion_and_categories.rst:- One can use
:meth:`sage.structure.parent.Parent.register_coercion`, normally
...
The converse indeed does not work at this point and I totally agree
that this is very annoying.
As for the general theme of this thread: +1111 to having many more
crosslinks. That's the number 1 missing feature of our documentation.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
