2015-02-18 19:24 UTC+01:00, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be>:
> On 2015-02-18 18:59, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> When I asked Bill about the cb_pari_err_handle patch, he asked why sage
>> wasn't using the standard pari error trapping mechanism.
> That patch is a pure backport from upstream git. So what Sage uses is a
> PARI error handling mechanism which is standard in PARI-unstable. It's
> just not yet in PARI-stable.
>
>> I don't quite understand your point about pari : if you want a newer
>> version, the right solution is to contribute upstream and get it
>> shipped.
> ...and wait one or two years before the fix is shipped in the stable
> release? And that's assuming that upstream actually accepts the patch.

The point of the patch is not about contributing to upstream as it is
already upstream, included in PARI-unstable.

The pari cycle release (~2 years?) is very slow compared to the one of
Sage (~3 months?). I see only two solutions for having something
within debian:
 - slow down Sage releases to follow PARI ones
 - or ask PARI to release official unstable versions

Vincent

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to