2015-02-18 19:24 UTC+01:00, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be>: > On 2015-02-18 18:59, Julien Puydt wrote: >> When I asked Bill about the cb_pari_err_handle patch, he asked why sage >> wasn't using the standard pari error trapping mechanism. > That patch is a pure backport from upstream git. So what Sage uses is a > PARI error handling mechanism which is standard in PARI-unstable. It's > just not yet in PARI-stable. > >> I don't quite understand your point about pari : if you want a newer >> version, the right solution is to contribute upstream and get it >> shipped. > ...and wait one or two years before the fix is shipped in the stable > release? And that's assuming that upstream actually accepts the patch.
The point of the patch is not about contributing to upstream as it is already upstream, included in PARI-unstable. The pari cycle release (~2 years?) is very slow compared to the one of Sage (~3 months?). I see only two solutions for having something within debian: - slow down Sage releases to follow PARI ones - or ask PARI to release official unstable versions Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.