On Monday, March 1, 2010 at 4:39:59 AM UTC-8, William wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Peter Jeremy <peterjer...@acm.org> > wrote: > > >>For what is worth, we use cmake in FEMhub (femhub.org) as a standard > >>package and we never had any problems with that. > > > > If CMake was widely used (and hence can be listed as a prerequisite for > > building Sage - like gmake, bash etc) then it would have no overhead > > for Sage. > > CMake is definitely not as widely used as gmake and bash, so I'm > against making it a prerequisite for Sage. In the history of the Sage > project, the only prerequisite that was ever added was gfortran, and > that is really part of GCC (Gnu Compiler Collection), so fairly > standard. > > Anyway, as mentioned before, according to this thread: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/e91a204a2902afd/ccbdaa4792872282?lnk=gst&q=Heads+up#ccbdaa4792872282 > > singular is migrating to CMake. If that really happens, Sage will > have to include CMake, whether we want to or not. >
Hi, I wonder what is the latest on Sage and cmake? Ondrej Certik was just telling me about csympy, which uses cmake, and wondered whether that would be a deal break for inclusion of csympy as standard in Sage. Definitely 4 years ago it would have been. William > -- William > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
