On Friday, 12 December 2014 14:43:50 UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > IPython notebook and Sage command line (as Karl pointed out): >> >> > It would be nice if we could (easily) grab whatever ipynb does and just be > consistent with that, as the examples in the tickets in question and the > (presumably) bit-rotted patch show we weren't very successful at exactly > reproducing our command line behavior. >
Yes - this would be just fine, if for PYTHON (and Sage) we had this approach. Note that from the notebook point of view no stripping should be done still. And if some fiddling has to be done in the notebook, then it should be special treatment of doing extra for python/sage, rather that special treatment of NOT doing something strange for fortran. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.