What we still don't have is a working windows version. This is still a big blocker for being succesfull.
On Friday, December 5, 2014 8:17:44 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Helloooooo everybody ! > > I am preparing some Sage talk, and I wanted to say at some point: > "Honestly we are not that good. We have strong points but we miss many > things too. It all depends on what the developpers are interested in: we > are great on some research areas, and under water level on others" > > Somehow this question is also related to William's "Sage has failed", as > we cannot be a replacement for Mathematica/Maple/.... unless we cover all > kinds of mathematics. > > In your past experiences (possibly when using Sage to teach in a > classroom), in which areas do you think we are behind users' expectations ? > > If we had such a list, we could even start asking people around "Do you > work on X ? Cool, we need your help for something big". We could also have > a list of such domains on our website, and do some (cheap) propaganda like: > > "Sage as in 'Free Beer': if you can help us develop Sage's features in the > areas above, we owe you one. Actually we owe you many. Become a contributor > and be rewarded with a free beer from every Sage developper you will meet > around the world" > > We have to know what we cannot do. So let's make a list. > > Nathann > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
