> > >> > In your past experiences (possibly when using Sage to teach in a >> > classroom), in which areas do you think we are behind users' >> expectations ? >> I think the worst is symbolic stuff in general. >> > +5 > > http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/symbolics has it all >
Have you been updating that? My recollection is that it hadn't been that often (I add stuff occasionally), but if you are that would be awesome. Of course there are the links there to the lists of symbolic/calculus tickets. I think I can already summarize this thread in three sentences, which I will 'spin' slightly because it's easy to lose perspective :) Nathann, this might be helpful (or not) for you. * I want something fairly exotic to 'basic' users, but crucial to people in my research area/related areas. * Auto-generated documentation is nice, but it would be much much nicer to have someone competent write a coherent reference manual (or add to the existing documentation). * Even though symbolic manipulation is zillions of times easier than it was for anyone until 1980, it doesn't live up to the standards we now expect for computer algebra. Any other broad categories? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
