> Several developpers mentionned making it an "advice" instead of a "code", > so you can see that even the title was an open question. >
I voted for adopting the code but I would more comfortable with something like this being adopted as *guidelines* or *recommendations*, especially since the votes for and against seem to be roughly equal (please correct me if I am wrong as I haven't counted them recently). As with others, I am not particularly in favour of the idea that there be a committee to "enforce" a code of conduct. > Actually, some of us have been surprised at the speed at which this has > become a vote. If you give us an occasion to discuss the actual text, we > most surely will. > Well,Volker's thread has been open for two weeks and it is THE most discussed thread in sage-dev for quite some time. Also, Vicent has created a wiki page <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.sagemath.org%2FSageCommunityProposal&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNElD7cUsIZNGW868o7Pd5nEfqAjfw> with the express purpose of discussing and reaching consensus on the text. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
