We haven't formulated a policy yet. Obviously we'll have to delete old tarballs at one point, but is disk space really an issue already?
On Monday, November 17, 2014 11:22:00 AM UTC, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdem...@cage.ugent.be > <javascript:>> wrote: > > We should really *remove* the optional package stein-watkins-ecdb. > > > I can do this, but it would break for older Sage installs, right? > The bad one is in the "huge" directory, whereas the good one is in > "upstream". > > Besides that, there are three different instances of it in "upstream", > do we need them? > > > .../packages$ find -name "*watkins*" -size +100M > > ./huge/stein-watkins-ecdb.spkg > ./upstream/database_stein_watkins/database_stein_watkins-20070827.tar.bz2 > ./upstream/database_stein_watkins/database_stein_watkins-20030423.tar.bz2 > ./upstream/database_stein_watkins/database_stein_watkins-20110713.tar.gz > > > -- Harald > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
