This probably needs a bunch of testing to figure out which dependencies are not really compiled-in, so I wouldn't want to rush it into 6.4.
A better long-term plan is IMHO to use hashdist, which solves both the "compile time when switching branches" and LD_LIBRARY_PATH issues. On Monday, November 3, 2014 9:29:10 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2014-11-03 10:23, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Thanks, I should use sage -f more often. > > > > So, what became of Jeroen's idea of using the > > "order only dependency" feature of GNU make? > > Still a good idea. If Volker considers it a good idea for Sage-6.4, I'll > make a patch quickly. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
