Ok, you are talking about 1.0 argument, which should lower the precision to 53 bit.
We should probably use all inexact (floating-point) arguments to decide the precision, not just the first one. On Friday, October 10, 2014 12:32:29 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2014-10-10 12:38, Volker Braun wrote: > > This is probably what you wanted: > > > > sage: bessel_Y(RealField(200)(1), 1.0, hold=True) > > -0.78121282130028871654715000004796482054990639071644460784383 > No, that's not what I wanted. It doesn't make sense to return an answer > which is more precise than the input. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
