On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:03:46PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> IMO we should swap the order of the pairs. It would make it consistent
> with other parts of Sage too:
> ...
I have been dreaming of this change for quite some time. I don't have
an opinion on whether it's acceptable to change this so late though.
Another difficulty is that for vector spaces, __iter__ runs through
the coefficients:
sage: x = (QQ^4).an_element()
sage: x
(1, 0, 0, 0)
sage: list(x)
[1, 0, 0, 0]
So maybe the right way would be to instead implement iteritems for all
elements of ModulesWithBasis. The syntax is not so nice, but it's more
explicit.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
