Hi, I like the proposal to move some types over to FLINT. However, you removed some options, e.g. calling Pari, LinBox or IML for solving certain problems (charpoly, kernel, …). I'd prefer these options to be preserved as it is not clear to me a priori that FLINT will in all cases be fastest. Also, having choices allows to compare results.
Cheers, Martin On Tuesday 12 Aug 2014 10:12:04 Marc Masdeu wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I noticed that Sage was not using fmpz_mat_t for matrices > (probably when FLINT was incorporated in Sage it didn't yet have this). I > have opened a ticket (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16803 --thanks > pbruin!--) with a patch that reimplements matrix_integer_dense with FLINT, > and it would probably be a good idea to do a similar thing for fmpq_mat_t. > > In any case, I am new to FLINT so I might not be doing the right things, if > any expert is willing to review the ticket it would be great! > > Best, > > Marc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
