I have seen much worse than two pages of boring computations of errir estimates that lead to potentially useful code published in arxiv. I would go for that.
El viernes, 8 de agosto de 2014 10:48:20 UTC+2, Clemens Heuberger escribió: > > In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16782, I propose a patch implementing > the > Riemann Zeta function for complex intervals. > > For bounding the errors, I needed some rather boring estimates, in > particular > explicitly bounding errors in Taylor's theorem in my situation. These > boring > estimates now exist in the form of a TeX file (translating to 2 pages PDF) > on my > hard disk. > > I suppose that this is not an ideal solution, because reviewers might want > to > check what I did without having to do everything by themselves, and the > same > holds for future extensions/bugfixes etc. > > I find none of the following possibilities very appealing: > > - keep it on my hard disk (that is probably the traditional approach in > mathematical papers, the boring details are somewhat buried and > inaccessible). > > - Moving the TeX-code into the docstring (we are speaking about 2 pages, > after all). > > - Moving the TeX-code as comments into the code (same problem and you'd > have to > read the TeX code instead of a compiled version). > > - Putting it into arxiv (way to boring content for arxiv). > > - Putting it onto my web page and inserting a link to it (may be a > compromise) > > Is there any canonical place for such background documentation, possibly > within > the sage source tree? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
