I have yet another example of the brittleness of Sage binaries. See trac#16694 <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16694> for details. Roughly, a binary compiled with "SAGE_FAT_BINARY="yes" gives a defective Sage's R on a machine differing from the original one.
I may have another one in preparation : on the original machine, Sage's R cannot install rstan (an HMC sampler of some importance), whereas this install without any problem under system's R. I'm still tracking this one... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
