How is that related? I agree with Nicolas, gens() or generators() shall be the most specific kind of generator. You can always have whatever_generators() for generators of any kind of substructure in addition.
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:46:20 PM UTC-4, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:04:49 PM UTC-4, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> >>> We do want to try and get away from the sometimes ambiguous gens() to >>> explicit_generators() >>> >> >> Unless you also envision an implicit_generators() that is a bad name. >> Generators are almost always involve choices, deal with it. >> > > This does cause real problems: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15381 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
