Hello !!
> We've actually just thought of a completely different approach that we
> _might_ or _might not_ go with. There are advantages (which include not
> having to deal with this problem at all) and disadvantages that we need to
> carefully consider (if it's of interest the idea is here:
> https://github.com/theref/sage-game-theory/issues/48).
Well, indeed if you just import functions from the gambit library
inside of your functions then you will have no problem with the doc
:-)
> With regards to the optional compilation, I might have expressed myself
> poorly. We've found another solution. Would adding the following to all.py in
> our game_theory folder be 'acceptable' with regards to general Sage etiquette
> etc:
>
> from sage.misc.package import is_package_installed
> from cooperative_game import CooperativeGame
> if is_package_installed('gambit'):
> from normal_form_game import *
>
> normal_form_game.py is the module that imports and inherits from gambit.
HMmmmmm... Well, I have no idea about Sage's etiquette on this respect :-D
It would be better to import the functions you need inside of each
function, but well.. If it is this or no doc, this is definitely
better ^^;
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
