Just wanted a sanity check from someone more familiar with the parallel 
code.

I'm reviewing #15966 and the change is basically to clean up the child 
processes used for parallelization. As far as I could tell no one is 
calling this anywhere in the code base (until we are in #15920) so perhaps 
this defect was overlooked before, unless it is there for some reason (and 
thus not a defect).

As far as I can tell all tests pass and the change cleans up the child 
processes.

Thanks,
  Ben

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to