lol... IIRC, William has gotten a few libraries to change their licenses. It is a genuine request, and there is no blackmail here.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as Sage is concerned, anything that is GPLv3 compatible is fine (this > includes LGPL). > > I don't understand the thought process that leads to somebody trying to > blackmail a library into changing their license to be more liberal with the > implicit threat that, otherwise, some piece of code wouldn't be released. > Where the whole point of the more liberal license is that one wouldn't have > to release the source code using the library at all. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
