In http://ask.sagemath.org/question/3282/ it was revealed that in Sage, the 
MILP interface defaults (like most such software) to assuming nonnegative 
variables as a constraint, which they has to be explicitly undone.  It 
looks like the (possibly unrelated) linear_program command also does this. 
 This is natural in that world.  However, Nathann did a little digging upon 
my request and discovered that Matlab and Maple apparently (?) don't assume 
this.  

So... should we change our interface?  Or should we keep it the same as it 
was?  I can think of arguments for both.  Input would be appreciated, 
especially from those who have actually used this functionality (perhaps in 
contexts not "about" LP).

- kcrisman

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to