Hellooooooo everybody !
I just created ticket that adds a new codes.<tab> object to Sage gathering
all codes that Sage can build, the same way that we already have such
objects for groups/graphs/designs/matroids and perhaps others.
Basu wondered if it made sense to keep all constructors in the global
namespace at the same time. Because right now, you can do both
sage: HammingCode(3,GF(2))
Linear code of length 7, dimension 4 over Finite Field of size 2
and
sage: codes.HammingCode(3,GF(2))
Linear code of length 7, dimension 4 over Finite Field of size 2
So, well. Do we keep them, do we remove them ? I'm all for removing them
from the global namespace too, as they can all be found through the
codes.<tab> object anyway. What do you think ?
And I guess we can ask ourselves the same question for groups too. And
designs.
Graphs behave well already :-P
Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun !
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
