On Monday, October 7, 2013 5:05:52 PM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: > > I think this holds uniformly, i.e., the class can go, being an > inappropriate abstraction. I think in all cases a simple boolean (both in > cython and in python code) will do better. >
I don't think the Python attribute is going to be faster. In any case, the point is not that you can't implement it yourself but that it makes it easy to implement the mutability pattern. If that ends up being a bottleneck then it is easy to optimize later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
