I never did figure out how to grab the latest snapshot off the gf2x dev
site, I had been working with the tarballs linked in this thread, of which
I never tested one that worked (though, I believe we determined which
changes would fix the problem).
Right now that machine is being tortured by running some long calculations
which are making the machine fairly unusable. These should be done sometime
tomorrow, I can try to build the latest snapshot then.

- Andrew


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori <jpfl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems I only sent my reply to Emmanuel.
> So briefly:
> - Andrew: can you please confirm that the latest tarball provided by
> Emmanuel is fixed?
> - if that's the case, I'll open a trac ticket to update the gf2x spkg
> provided by Sage and it should make its way into Sage 5.12 or 5.13.
>
> Best,
> JP
>
>
> On Friday, October 4, 2013 6:41:19 PM UTC+2, Emmanuel Thomé wrote:
>
>> could you pleae confirm that the fix I've committed to the gf2x main
>> branch fixes the issue you encounter ? This is a genuine bug which
>> deserves to be fixed, so:
>>  - I care about whether my changes correct the issue.
>>  - I don't mind creating a bugfix tarball if deemed useful.
>>
>> On the other hand, if you consider the gf2x-1.1 spkg as distributed in
>> sage-5.11 as something immutable you can't change, there's not much I
>> can do. Frankly, you'd be better off replacing the spkg with a really
>> fixed one...
>>
>> E.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Robert Campbell <rcam...@umbc.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > The bug appears to be something in gf2x's configure.ac file, but as I
>> know
>> > little about writing config scripts it's hard to give advice.
>> >
>> > In the meantime, here is a simple step-by-step for those who want
>> SAGE-5.11
>> > but have an old pre-SSE2 machine (schools & cheapskates like me):
>> >
>> > 1) Confirm that your machine doesn't have SSE2 - look for the sse2 flag
>> in
>> > the /proc/cpuinfo file.
>> > 2) Edit the gf2x spkg file:
>> >    a) copy sage-5.11/spkg/standard/gf2x-**1.1.spkg to a working
>> location
>> >    b) tar -jxvf gf2x-1.1.spkg
>> >    c) Edit gf2x-1.1/spkg-install:
>> >       Edit line 38 to read ./configure --enable-sse2=no
>> > --prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL"
>> >    d) tar -jcvf gf2x-1.1.spkg gf2x-1.1
>> >    e) move gf2x-1.1.spkg back to its original location in
>> > sage-5.11/spkg/standard/.
>> > 3) Compile SAGE as usual
>> >
>> > Most folks in this situation will not want to compile SAGE themselves
>> (it
>> > took me 37 hours on my 1.3 GHz Athlon) and it would be nice to have a
>> > pre-compiled version available.  An easy solution would be a binary
>> from
>> > before the bug was introduced (gf2x-1.1 and hence SAGE-5.11), but I
>> don't
>> > see that older binary versions are available from sagemath.org.
>> >
>> > Robert Campbell
>> >
>> > On Friday, September 20, 2013 9:01:13 AM UTC-4, Andrew Fiori wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is likely a build error bug on all systems which do not support
>> SSE2
>> >> but where building is done using the current version of gcc. It may
>> also
>> >> manifest as a runtime error on binary builds installed on systems
>> which do
>> >> not support SSE2 (but I have not tested that).
>> >>
>> >> I am submitting this here rather than to bug tracker for several
>> reasons:
>> >>    - It is unlikely anyone cares enough to fix this properly upstream
>> >> (which is where the bug really is).
>> >>    - The build error only effects building from source on systems that
>> are
>> >> out of date and will becoming even less common going forward.
>> >>
>> >> I am mentioning it at all, because it will help anyone who comes
>> across
>> >> this error in the future. The same type of error may cause somewhat
>> >> confusing runtime errors in other packages (bug tracker searches
>> suggest
>> >> this type of issue has come up before in other packages).
>> >>
>> >> The bug:
>> >>   The bug is somewhere in the gf2x build scripts
>> "src/config/acinclude.m4"
>> >> or "src/configure" somehow it decides whether or not the system
>> supports
>> >> sse2 (look around line 75 of acinclude.m4. It appears to do this by
>> checking
>> >> if gcc can compile something that uses sse2. It turns out that it
>> can...
>> >> even if the system you are on cannot. Consequently it tries to build
>> >> everything with sse2. This causes a problem when it tries to tune
>> itself
>> >> "src/src/tune-lowlevel.pl". Around line 70-78 it tries to run the
>> compiled
>> >> code. Most of these don't require sse2 really, and so work, some do
>> (mul3t,
>> >> mul3k, mul3k2) these fail, it then can't pick which one to use, and
>> >> terminates building.
>> >>    If there are other places in sage where similar sse2 detection is
>> used,
>> >> but which are not executed at build time (most things are not), then
>> sage
>> >> will encounter unexpected runtime bugs when pieces of code that can
>> benefit
>> >> from sse2 are used.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The solution:
>> >>    gf2x doesn't require sse2 to work. The easiest way to build it on a
>> >> system where the above bug is encountered is to modify:
>> >>    spkg-install:38 to become:
>> >>    ./configure --enable-sse2=no --prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL"
>> >> You don't really want to do this in the main branch though, as this
>> slows
>> >> things down for the 99+% of people who don't have an archaic system
>> they are
>> >> trying to run sage on.
>> >> A better solution is to add an if statement at this place and
>> environment
>> >> variable globally to disable sse2 when it doesn't exist.
>> >> Alternatively one could invest the time and figure out then fix gf2x
>> build
>> >> system.
>> >>
>> >> - Andrew
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> > Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/**topic/sage-devel/Cp1lDMzyCrU/**
>> unsubscribe<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/Cp1lDMzyCrU/unsubscribe>.
>>
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> > sage-devel+...@**googlegroups.com.
>> > To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com.
>> > Visit this group at 
>> > http://groups.google.com/**group/sage-devel<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel>.
>>
>> > For more options, visit 
>> > https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/Cp1lDMzyCrU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to