Quite the contrary, we are looking at the specs when designing our annotations features. We hope that when it is fully developed it'll be 'up to spec'. :)
On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 10:29:00 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > In particular, hypothes.is works on a and implements the open annotation > draft spec > > http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/ > > Though it seems like there is no overlap between flooved and the open > annotation community, which would be disappointing if true. > > > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 9:11:12 AM UTC+1, Burcin Erocal wrote: >> >> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:31:43 -0500 >> Jason Grout <jason...@creativetrax.com> wrote: >> >> > On 9/3/13 11:26 AM, Jason Grout wrote: >> > > And a collaborative annotation system for books is certainly >> > > something interesting to see. >> > >> > *Especially* if there is an easy way to export the annotations out of >> > the system. I'm not very much a fan of systems where comments and >> > other interesting content is locked into a proprietary layer above >> > the free stuff. >> >> Talking about open standards and annotations, you might find this >> interesting: >> >> http://hypothes.is/ >> >> >> Cheers, >> Burcin >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
