Hi Matthew, On 2013-08-29, Matthew Weippert <matthew.weipp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rather than re-creating the bug, I propose that the value returned from > cardinality be cached in the Combinations class. Making calls to a gap > subprocess sounds like a heavy-weight thing to do for every random call.
This sounds like a good idea, independent of the potential bug/leak. > Should I submit an "enhancement" ticket? I think it would not be an enhancement, because it isn't an additional functionality. But creating a bug fix ticket sounds reasonable. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
