Look at Integer.__mod__ vs. Rational.__mod__, this'll make it clear how to fix it.
Apparently the design decision was to call Rational.__mod__(int, Rational) in that case. It would be nice to have some explanation why. On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:28:20 AM UTC-4, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > > sage: int(5) % QQ(2) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > TypeError Traceback (most recent call last > ) > <ipython-input-4-8ec0f9994ded> in <module>() > ----> 1 int(Integer(5)) % QQ(Integer(2)) > > TypeError: Argument 'self' has incorrect type (expected sage.rings. > rational.Rational, got int) > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
