On 2013-06-19, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > --20cf301ee7a5191d5204df850b33 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hellooooooooo everybody ! > > I just noticed in today's release the presence of two tickets that I had > missed while they were being reviewed, and I really regret it. > > Those two tickets are #14734 and #14732. Each of them adds to Graph and > Poset a one-line method which I personnally find totally useless. Of > course, while I don't see the point of these methods, I don't expect to > find everything that Sage can do meaningful, as I have after all my own > personnal restricted field of interest, *but* the fact that these functions > could be written in 30 characters really makes me think harder.
Deliberately ignoring the decorator technicalities, I think both #14734 and #14732 have been wrongly designed. (Throw rotten tomatoes at me now). Regarding #14734: well, if one adds to Graph a grow_bushy_tail() method indeed this goes too far. I personally don't get why Bushy_Tail cannot get a constructor from Graph instead. This would only be justified if growing bushy tails inside Graph is more efficient than doing it outside of it. Same applies to #14732: why on Earth it makes Posets vomit ((c) V.Braun) Graphs all of a sudden? Shouldn't rather Graph get a constructor from Posets? Having said that, the gals and guys responsible for #14734 and #14732 are at Sagedays 49 now, go and buy them the necessary amount of beer to have all this sorted out :-) Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
