On Saturday, June 8, 2013 5:14:30 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > The way we use libtool to produce shared libraries of ATLAS is not > portable. >
I agree that this is ugly as sin. At one point we will have to switch Sage to the new-style shared libraries that upstream introduced, which package the blas code in a different way. The current libtool hack is just a stopgap for that. In particular, I would rather work on abstracting the blas choice into pkgconfig-style scripts and push that into sage than hardcode slightly different names for atlas. Then we'll also be able to use different vendors like OpenBLAS and MKL. Until then Cygwin can just use the Cygwin ATLAS libraries IMHO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
