Isn't graphviz under the EPL? Thats not so bad. And we don't even want to link to it, so its perfectly fine for us to distribute it.
How about a new category of "extra" spkgs that are nice to have but not really required. We could even install them by default, if wanted. Perhaps only if you have internet access during installation. The license requirements could be relaxed, since by this definition we don't link to it. And I would propose that the failure of build/check of an "extra" spkg on a platform would not prevent Sage from installing successfully. There is quite a list of TeX packages that the pdf docs use but the average TeX installation does't have. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
