I posted a patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/14627 (needs review)
With the patch there is no measurable performance difference between setA and setB On Monday, May 20, 2013 8:04:14 PM UTC+1, Stefan wrote: > > cpdef setA(A, X, V, m): > AA = <Matrix> A > for i in xrange(m): > AA.set_unsafe(X[i][0], X[i][1], AA.get_unsafe(X[i][0], X[i][1]) + > V[i]) > > cpdef setB(B, X, V, m): > for i in xrange(m): > B[X[i][0]][X[i][1]] = B[X[i][0]][X[i][1]] + V[i] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
