> Do you mean to say that we check that (1,2) is in the domain, and > utilize this info?
O_O Are you doing this on purpose ? If you want to find the "orbit" of ((1,2),(1,2)) with Sage and if we implement this "action" thing, then : - When you write g.action( ((1,2),(1,2)), action="OnPoints") Sage refuses what you give it for ((1,2),(1,2)) does not belong to the domain - When you write g.action( ((1,2),(1,2)), action="OnTuples") then Sage checks that (1,2) is indeed in the doman (it is a vertex of your circuit) and returns [((1,2),(1,2)), (1,1), (2,2)], that is a set of pairs (vertex, vertex) - When you write g.action( ((1,2),(1,2)), action="OnSets") Then Sage either refuses to work because your "set" contains twice the same element, or reduces your "set" to ((1,2)) in which case it returns a list of sets equal to [((1,2)), (1), (2)] When is it ambiguous ? Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
