Hi Keshav, On 2013-03-22, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> writes: >> However, if you *are* upstream (i.e., if your data are only published in >> this form, but not as an independent project), I'd say tracking it with >> mercural is fine. But perhaps other people have a different viewpoint. > > Please don't. When we merge all the SPKGs' repositories in the git > transition we don't want to pull in upstream source as well. Feel free > to just leave it untracked in the src/ directory, like other SPKGs do.
Perhaps you misunderstood. When I wrote "However, if you *are* upstream", I really meant that the spkg is the only place in which the code is published. Hence, "we don't want to pull in upstream source as well" simply does not apply. The question is: Do we want to *remove* source, just because Sage is the only project that has this code? Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
