Well it is registered under my name so I'm not going to post the keys to the mailing list ;-) But as far as I understand it, the MKL binaries can be distributed. I haven't had time yet to really look and see what the non-distributable part is (partly because my laptop died).
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 4:41:54 AM UTC-4, François wrote: > > On 17/03/13 10:43, Volker Braun wrote: > > Just FYI, I received an Linux/OSX Intel MKL license (its closed-source > > BLAS) for the Sage project . As I've written earlier, I'm planning to > > make Sage more vendor-agnostic so we don't have ATLAS hardcoded > everywhere. > > > > Cool. Is it only for you personally or can we get a generic one for > sage development? > > Do you have a ticket for the ATLAS independence stuff? Or do you want > to discuss it here. I greped the log of sage-on-gentoo and I officially > declared sage-on-gentoo could use "any" BLAS in Gentoo on Friday 16th of > July 2010: > commit 44c5b767c3fe2af0b372a798d94f9021932bf6a8 > Author: Fran<C3><A7>ois Bissey <f.r.b...@massey.ac.nz <javascript:>> > Date: Fri Jul 16 23:00:43 2010 +1200 > > Sage is independent of ATLAS and can be built against other BLAS. > > So if you work on that I have a deep interest in getting my > sage-on-gentoo fixes go away and be replaced by something generic > upstream. > > Francois > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
