Hi Nils, On 2013-02-19, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: > __richcmp__ is not a special method for python classes. You need to > implement __eq__ etc for those. I'd hope (and this example > corroborates it) that cython decided to use the same semantics for non- > cdef classes. Your example wouldn't change if you called the method > __foo__ instead.
Yes, you are right. But the conclusion is the same: dictionaries use hash and ==, and thus hash should better be compatible with the __richcmp__ method resp. with __eq__, while __cmp__ is unrelated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
