Hello Harald, thanks for your quick reply > Honestly personal answer: no. But I'm happy to be proven wrong :-) > I would be greatly interested in your opinion why you think "no". Simulation does play a big role when analysing systems (which I use Sage for) and I personally like having the whole toolbox "in one piece". However, it surely does not make sense to integrate everything into Sage and I am not fully aware of the Sage philosophy of what would be sensible to put into Sage and what not. This is the reason behind my post here.
> Since it is a normal python package, the first step of integrating this > into sage is to package it as an experimental SPKG. Then, it is at least > very easy to install. > Fully agree, I did not have making a simulation part of the standard in mind. As I said, I created a "personal experimental package" and integrated it ito one of my Sage installs. This is absolutly sufficient for my personal use. However, if the community thinks it is worthwhile I would put it up for review. Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
