On 2013-01-31, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > Hi Jori, hi Dima, > > On 2013-01-31, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> - What is naming policy? Should this be is_conjugate? What is best order >>> for >>> arguments? >> Indeed, I would keep the naming as close to GAP's one as possible. > > "As close as possible" is, I think, not a good advice -- because it > could be understood to adopt GAP's function name IsConjugate. And I think this > would violate our nameing conventions and could thus yield to > confusion.
oops, I meant to say "as close as possible" - but obeying Sage "standards", i.e. IsBlah becomes is_blah > >>> - Is this stupid idea at beginning, and if not, is this oneliner going to >>> blow >>> up when trying with real examples? >> no, why? >> >> Perhaps, if you're up it, it's best to start also adding that kind of >> functionality via libGAP... > > +1 > > Cheers, > Simon > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
