On 2013-01-31, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> writes: >> On 2013-01-23, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:53 PM, tom d <sdent...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Another possible solution would be to change the error message one gets on >>>> a >>>> failed import statement. (I also lost hair on this issue a couple days >>>> ago.) Right now it says 'have you tried %upgrade?' or something similar; >>>> it >>>> could include the recommendation to -sync-build. >>> >>> +1 to this idea, -1 to making ./sage -b take longer. >> >> couldn't we just call sage -sync-build automatically, if importing >> fails? >> (with a proper message, of course) >> Or is it going to mess things up in some cases? > > Isn't the problem that importing succeeds when it shouldn't? How can we > detect that? well, I read that people don't want sage -sync-build to be called from sage -b, as it takes extra few seconds. I'm just saying "OK, if this is the only issue, why can't we do this only if something goes wrong?"
> > -Keshav > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.