But we currently use ATLAS-3.8.4 for which I'm not aware of any precision bug. ATLAS-3.10 also fixed the iml bug. I don't know of any numerical errors larger than the expected floating point precision.
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 2:09:48 AM UTC, François wrote: > > Well my personal take on it is that the ATLAS build had a small issue. > In the context of > sage-on-gentoo i have seen particular version of Atlas or other cblas > break only one doctest > as an indication that there was a fault or a difference with the atlas > sage usually ship. > Early version of atlas 3.9 were breaking one test linked to iml. Volker > has a problem with linbox in his early 3.9 spkg. I use openblas and it > breaks a single doctest with an error of the order of 1e-15 (ok cython.py > is also broken in two places but that's not numerics, it is a library > list).is build-related error appear on lots of machines (i.e. have other > people encountered it), or only on your specific machine > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
