On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Benjamin Jones
<benjaminfjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Sebastien,
>>
>>> But not for multiplication by a negative number :
>>>
>>> sage: - (x > 100)
>>> -x > -100
>>>
>>> Do you consider this to be a bug? I would prefer the answer "-x < -100" to 
>>> preserve the space of solutions. Do you?
>>>
>>
>> The result is not what I would expect. However, I will let someone more 
>> versed with the symbolic ring officially call it a bug.
>>
>> It's also not just negation, but honest multiplication:
>>
>>    sage: (-1)*(x > 100)
>>    -x > -100
>>    sage: ZZ(-1)*(x > 100)
>>    -x > -100
>>    sage: SR(-1)*SR(x > 100)
>>    -x > -100
>>
>> Best,
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "sage-devel" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> It's hard to tell from the implementation if this behavior is intentional, 
> unintentional, or a bug. The implementation is just that multiplication maps 
> over relational operators like ==, <, <=, etc. But I think it's not possible 
> in the current framework to make multiplication preserve the truth of a 
> statement, e.g.
>
> if y > 0 is true,
> is x*(y > 0) true or false?
>
> You can't decide unless you know more about x. If you want to make 
> multiplying by elements in SR preserve truth of a statement you have to 
> decide this.
>
> The same question has come up on ask.sagemath: 
> http://ask.sagemath.org/question/1656/multiplying-an-inequality-by-1
>
> --
> Benjamin Jones

Sorry for the noise..  I meant to say (at the top) that from the
implementation (of sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._mul_) it's
pretty clear that this behavior *is* intentional, not a bug, but
that's not to say it's desirable in all situations.

--
Benjamin Jones

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to