Perhaps, I should explain my rationale for the terms I chose, my first preference is `echelonize(v)` (although I wrote it second) because, what the function returns amounts to its reduced row echelon form, if you think of it as 1 x n matrix.
~KnS. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kannappan Sampath <kntri...@gmail.com> writes: > > Here's a "natural" place where I can see this is helpful: > > > > To carry out, Gauss-Jordan like row reductions, where you'd like the > > first non-zero entry in a row (the so-called pivot) to be 1, I think > > this is very helpful. > > > > So, I'd be **for** keeping this, perhaps in a different name, that > > would reflect this. Like `reduce(v)` or perhaps, `echelonize(v)` for > > instance. > > I vote for monicize() ;) > > -Keshav > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
