I'm happy with E... It would be nice to also have it as UCF.E in case you overrode E already with something else in an interactive session though.
On Sunday, November 25, 2012 6:49:51 PM UTC, Christian Stump wrote: > > Hi -- > > we are almost ready getting the universal cyclotomic field, UCF (which > is the smallest subfield of the complex numbers containing all roots > of unity) into sage, see > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8327. > > In GAP, the point of entry is the function E, like in E(5) to get exp( > 2 \pi i / 5 ) . The question is: > > Do people agree to use this letter as well in Sage ? > > Alternatively, we could use e.g. UCF.E instead, but I'd somehow prefer > to do it completely analogously to GAP. On some machines, we currently > get a segfault in sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py > which might be caused by the fact that people used there as well the > letter E to work with elliptic curves. > > Cheers, Christian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
