On 2012-10-30, Jernej Azarija <azi.std...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ------=_Part_1698_7171753.1351582604933
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Monday, 29 October 2012 22:49:03 UTC+1, Tom wrote:
>>
>> Here's a list of 21 edge-transitive graphs on 6 vertices. 
>>
[...]
>> They've all got 6 vertices.  They're all edge transitive.  That means 
>> Weisstein's list is wrong. 

no, not really. He just doesn't count empty graphs. Somewhere on 
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Edge-TransitiveGraph.html
you can read:

"Counting empty graphs as edge-transitive, the numbers of edge-transitive
graphs on , 2, ... nodes are 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 21, 27, .... "

So it's a misunderstand related to definitions used, rather than 
a bug in someone's code, it seems.

Dima


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to