Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> writes: > Le 31/08/2012 00:19, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:17 PM, David Roe<roed.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What in particular was bothersome about github? > >> Issue-tracking in particular is sub-par on github (though I've heard >> they've been working on this), and having to both is a pain. There's >> also the question of logging/preserving the development history. > > For a one-tree mercurial project, preserving the development history > is trivial (ask "mercurial to git conversion" to any web search > engine). For something like sage where each spkg is it's own project > tree, that is much much less so.
See http://github.com/kini/sage-workflow for some work on this. I wrote a bash script which converts all of Sage's 90+ Mercurial repos into a single git repository with a new directory structure. -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
