On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 15:59:22 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2012-04-24 05:49, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Monday, 23 April 2012 21:02:05 UTC+8, William wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Dan Drake <> wrote: > > > sagenb.org <http://sagenb.org> is so slow as to be unusable right > > now. Can someone > > > investigate? Perhaps restart it? > > > > It gets automatically restarted twice a day anyways. It's just > > massively overused compared to the server resources and scalability > of > > the app. Encourage me to do a complete truly scalable rewrite on > > scalable infrastructure... > > > > Would one still need hardware and bandwidth way beyond what NSF and > > other grants > > can pay for, if the usage growth continues like this? > Isn't the main bottleneck software currently? >
If 1% of registered sagenb users would run stuff on boxen at the same time, this would be 900 instances of sagenb. I doubt boxen can handle this smoothly, even if they were interactive non-graphic terminal sessions. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
