On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Florent Hivert wrote: > Hi, > >> Perhaps we should make my fork the "official" sage-mode repository so that >> Nick no longer has to be involved. > > I've write (maybe even admin) access on Nick's repo I'm pretty sure he will > agree to give your the same right. So I don't really see the point of having a > new fork. It will just add some confusion, or am I missing something ?
Oh, okay. I didn't know that was possible. The only confusion of still using his repo will be that his name is on it but he (presumably) won't have anything to do with it. >>>> FWIW, I've been meaning to make an spkg with my changes (adding AUCTeX >>>> support for SageTeX). It would also include customization of the preamble >>>> and possibly a fix for this problem. >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "include customization of the preamble" but >>> the >>> patch I submitted was exactly for that purpose. So the LaTeX preamble should >>> now be fully customizable in emacs customization menus. What I would like to >>> have is to include Sage's "latex.extra_preamble()" to emacs >>> preamble. Unfortunately I don't know how to get this from emacs. >> >> Sorry, I meant that it includes your changes in this area. > > When did you made your "fork" ? Isn't your patch already there ? I forked, made the change, and then submitted a pull request. So my fork isn't very old. -Ivan -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
