On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 05:03:08PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
> I agree that it would be nice if __*__ and _*_ showed up in the
> documentation.
> David
>
> Then run "sage --docbuild -u reference html". According to "sage
> --docbuild help":
>
> -u, --underscore include variables prefixed with '_' in reference
> manual; may be slow, may fail for PDF output
>
> (It should probably say something other than "variables" here.") This
> increases the size of the reference manual, slows down the build (as
> noted), and will likely produce many warnings, since docstrings for
> underscore methods haven't received as much attention as for non-private
> methods, so many of them are misformatted.
Not quite: I only want the .__*__ and ._*_ methods. Not the other ._*,
for which it was indeed settled that there were too many of them.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
