On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:09 PM, mhampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package? > I think that would be OK, most users probably have no idea its in > there now. I used to use it through Sage for some collaborative work, > but being packaged in Sage doesn't really have any extra added value.
It would have more value if it were well tested in Sage, but I don't think it actually is. > With the improvements in notebook editing (tinymce editor), I have > moved my collaborations to just using the notebook. > > No one sounds fired up about it so I think it should be moved to > experimental packages. > > -Marshall > > On Mar 27, 12:10 pm, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various >> threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially: >> >> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package? >> >> [ ] Yes >> [ ] No >> >> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or >> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether? >> >> [ ] Convert to optional >> [ ] Get rid of altogether >> >> (It's easy to get rid of: see >> <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.) >> >> -- >> John > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
